🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are watching intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a law increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated a leading MEP behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a young person who died after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are secure and fit for children," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from various figures to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more measured tone. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this international debate evolves, the steps of Australia and several other countries show that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.